FEBRUARY 2003

COOPER'S LANDING

NEWSLETTER

Volume 1, Issue 4
February 24 , 2003


LEWIS & CLARK MUSICAL

   On Jan. 17, a troupe of 60 students, faculty and alumni from Mizzou appeared on stage at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville. In honor of the National Bicentennial, MU is producing “Corps of Discovery: A Musical Journey”, the nation's first musical drama featuring the Lewis and Clark expedition. The Charlottesville performance was the first time the University presented highlights of all three acts of the drama. MU previously presented Act I at Carnegie Hall and the Kennedy Center.
    “Corps of Discovery: A Musical Journey” makes its world premiere May 2,3, and 4th at the historic Missouri Theatre, located at 203 S. Ninth St. Tickets are available through the University Concert Series at (800) 292-9136, or online at Concert Series.
   Other scheduled performances include a staged reading at the York Theater in New York City on March 2, 2003, and at St. Louis' National Convention of “Opera America” on June 13 and June 15. For ticket information call (800) 430-2966.


CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET BILL
INCLUDES LEWIS & CLARK!

   It was reported on February 16 that Missouri's US Senator, Kit Bond, has been busy adding his 'two-cents' into the budget bill ($254 million dollar's worth!) that is currently waiting for President Bush's signature. Included in Senator Bond's request was $500,000 for the Lewis and Clark Boat House and Nature Center in St. Charles, MO.
   As you may already be aware, most of our State tourism dollars are going to the St. Louis area, and Kansas City. The middle of the state seems to be a mere pit-stop along the way. Thankfully, Steve Johnson of the MO. River Communities, has received grants to build a website focusing on the historical significance of the center of our state for Lewis and Clark visitors and history buffs.


It's Not Wise to Fool with Mother Nature (con't):

TWO SIDES CLASH OVER
MISSOURI RIVER'S PATH

   According to the Associated Press on July 10, 2002, since the decision to return the Missouri River to a more seasonal flow was currently out of the hands of Congress, Senators were using a Congressional Hearing to prod the Army Corps of Engineers to act. The hearing was the first opportunity lawmakers had to publicly challenge the Corps since the agency postponed, indefinitely, a long-awaited plan for altering the river's flow to protect endangered fish and birds.
     It also came days after the US Fish and Wildlife Service effectively blocked the Corps from releasing more water to drought-stricken communities, ruling that endangered shorebirds cannot be moved from drought-exposed islands and sandbars where they are nesting.
   The Wildlife Service says a more natural flow, with heavier releases in spring and less water in the summer, is the only way to protect two shorebirds, the Piping Plover and the Least Tern, and a fish, the Pallid Sturgeon. The Wildlife Service administers the Endangered Species Act and has given the Corps until 2003 to comply.
   The Wildlife Service's plan is embraced by folks who live upriver, where the plan would provide more water for a booming lake recreation industry. But downriver barge and farming industries say the plan would devastate their businesses, and flood-prone communities worry that spring releases would flood their homes. They point out that drought has already affected shipping on the Missouri River. For those of you who visited Cooper's Landing in August, I'm sure you noticed sandy islands where there never had been before. Folks were actually swimming out to the sand bars because the river was so low.
   One St. Louis-based barge company owner told the Nebraska Public Radio that low river water will put people out of work, not just on the boats, but the people that load and unload the barges. The water level affects people's livelihoods, and it affects the price the farmer gets for his corn and soybeans...inevitably passing the cost onto the consumer.


WANTED: OPINIONS!

   Come on! After reading all these articles about the management of the Missouri River, surely some of you would like to express your opinion! We'll add an Editorial section so you can express your view point on the subject of the Missouri River.
    Does a 'healthy river ecosystem' include a navigable river?

How do YOU feel about the competing interests surrounding the management of the river?
    What do you think? We want your opinion, and would like to post it on our future newsletters. E-mail us how you feel!

EDITORIALS & OPINIONS

   OK. Here goes. I think that priorities need to be considered during extraordinarily tough economic times.
   Nature has always been about the survival of the fittest, and right now I'm rooting for people! I want commerce along the Missouri River.
   
So, there! Surely I've gotten someone's blood to boil! What do you think? Should we fight for a navigable river for commerce and agriculture, both areas that benefit our economy?
    — By Margot Gendreau (just a city slicker turned country!)
Please Note: Mike Cooper will be back next newsletter with his more knowledgable editorial comments.


We're glad you're thinking of contributing, and would love to add you to our E-mailing list! If interested, or would like to be included on the mailing list for Newsletter announcements, E-mail Mike Cooper at: Cooper's Landing

ARCHIVES

It's Not Wise to Fool with Mother Nature (con't):

NO SPRING RISE FOR
THE MISSOURI RIVER

   On October 2, 2002, the Associated Press reported from Washington that there will be no so-called spring rise on the Missouri River in 2003, according to high-ranking Army Corps of Engineers and Fish and Wildlife Service officials.
   The Corps was poised in June to reveal how it intended to alter the flow of the nation's longest waterway, as mentioned above. Instead, the agency yanked the plan and entered open-ended talks with the Wildlife Service.
   A letter was obtained revealing that the Chief of the Corps' Northwestern Region asked the Wildlife Service for a reprieve. Ongoing talks will delay any changes before spring 2003, but widespread drought would prevent a new plan anyway because higher spring flows are not recommended when water is in short supply.
   The Wildlife Service concurred, saying the Corps won't technically violate the Endangered Species Act because it seeks the spring surge only once every three years, on average.
   The White House indicated it wanted to delay changes in flow sought by the US Fish and Wildlife Service, because of the concern for wildlife.

NO RISE CONSENSUS FACES OPPOSITION!

   On December 16, according to a PRNewswire, a broad coalition of Missouri River stakeholders filed a notice of intent to sue the US Fish & Wildlife Service, the Corps of Engineers and State Fish & Game Agencies under the Endangered Species Act. Actions mandated by the Service and the Corps over the summer shut down navigation and caused server economic losses to coalition members. The coalition is comprised of farmers, navigators, municipalities, utilities, recreation & environmental interests, and industry. This issue impacts all states in the Missouri River and Mississippi River basins and serves as precedent for the operation of other rivers.
    The notice states:

  • Economic impacts were not properly considered when designating critical habitat for the Piping Plover.
  • The Fish & Wildlife Service's alternative for operation of the Missouri River will eliminate navigation and materially interfere with power, water supply and flood control.
  • The Corps of Engineers and the Fish & Wildlife Service must revise or remove operational mandates under the Endangered Species Act since new information shows that endangered and threatened birds have rebounded and meet or exceed certain recovery objectives.
  • There is no basis for a mandated spring rise since one already exists on most of the Missouri River.
  • The management of the upstream reservoirs to support non-native fish is illegal.
  • Hybrid Sturgeon may have been caused by the stocking program rather than habitat concerns.
    • Coalition members: The Coalition to Protect the Missouri River; the Illinois Corn Growers Association; the MO_ARK Association; the National Corn Growers Association; Blaske Marine, Inc.; ConocoPhillips; Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions, Inc., Koch Materials Company; Magnolia Marine Transport Company; Memco Barge Line, Inc.; River Barge Excursion Lines, Inc.; and the Terminal Grain Corporation.

     

CORPS PLANS A SHORTENED
BARGE SEASON

   Here's the latest: according to the Associated Press on Feb. 15, 2003 (last week), the US Army Corps of Engineers announced that the barge season on the Missouri River could be shortened for the first time since 1992 because of drought.
   Because of the lack of rain, the Corps said last week that it will operate the river at minimum service levels and anticipates the barge season will be shortened by five days in November. The final decision on shortening the season will be made in July.
   Navigators aren't banned from using the river at the end of the barge season. The Corps just won't provide an adequate water supply to make it possible. Looks like we'll all have to pray for rain!
   As expected, the barge operators criticized the decision to shorten the season. Don Huffman, manager of Missouri River sales and logistics for MEMCO Barge Line in St. Louis, called the decision a violation of the Corps' master manual. “We'd like to see them follow their own guideline, their own rules,”said Huffman.
   AND, remember from our last issue that American Rivers pointed to the anticipated Corps of Engineer's decision on the revision of the Missouri River Master Manual, which guides the management of the river, as an opportunity to improve the health of the river ecosystem.
    Now you are officially up to date on the two sides of the issue on how the Missouri River should flow, and how much it should flow. As I've said from the very beginning, it's not nice to fool with Mother Nature.


Get Your Bicentennial Navigation Map

   U. S. Corps of Engineers released a beautiful, highly informative Guide to Recreation and Visitor Safety for the Lower Missouri River. This multi-page map and guide separates the Missouri River into sections according to Lewis and Clark's journal entries. It includes Missouri River Access, Public Lands and Parks, boat ramps with fuel, the current river channel as well as the Missouri River in 1879, the Katy Trail State Park and trail heads, Lewis and Clark's journal entries, campsites, and so much more. The guide's design and durability is practical and essential for boat navigation, and will make an excellent souvenir for this monumental occasion.
   This guide is supported by the following agencies: US Corps of Engineers, Missouri Department of Conservation, Missouri Department of Natural Resources Division of State Parks, and the US Fish & Wildlife Service. For river maps and info, call the Missouri River Information Center Toll Free:
1-866-285-3219. The map is also available from Missouri River Communities Network in Columbia. Your donation of $5 will be greatly appreciated; e-mail Steve Johnson. or call 573-256-2602.


Mike Cooper - Proprietor
Margot Gendreau - Editor

 

FastCounter by bCentral

Courtesy of bCentral